Earlier in this series, I mentioned your team will need a handbook. We’ve also discussed the audit trails you should create while in the flow of your work. If you look hard, you’ll notice that the goal still isn’t to create “comprehensive documentation”. The idea is to create enough “sensible documentation” that helps make communication effective. In this post, I want to zoom into a very specific section. This relates to developer documentation.

Sometimes we give a free pass to any activity that seems collaborative. Before you know it, you’ve built half a dozen gate checks to deliver a single user story. Each of those “collaborative” gate-checks doesn’t just create interruptions and context switches. It also leaves an attention residue - your mind continues to think about the interruption even when you’ve switched to the task on hand. In this article we examine the ad-hoc “huddle” through a series of questions, so we can find out how much we really need them.

Like the pebble trail in the story of Hansel and Gretel, our projects need audit trails for us to keep track of changes, communicate on a daily basis, and to onboard and align people. We discuss the five most important trails in this article. In the context of distributed teams these represent communication and documentation in the flow of work.

To me, async agile is non-binary. The value of being more async is also in making the truly valuable synchronous activities more productive and fun. Pair programming is amongst the most frequent synchronous activities that agile teams, especially those that follow extreme programming (XP), practice. How do we weave this into a remote-native way of work?